VACATE AN ILLECAL RESTITUTION ORDER

I was convicted of mail Fraud in 2003 following a plea agreement. I was ordered to pay restitution at sentencing. The Plea did not specify restitution amount. At sentencing the Probation Officer determined Restitution on the basis of my "relevant conduct" in the amount of $1.2 million from "Declaration of Losses" sent to her privately by victims. I challenged this as not reliable and hearsay as the amounts were different from from the Loss Amounts . Because there where no actual testimonies or evidence presented into the record, challenged this Restitution amount. The government then told the Court that this amount was for "Intended Loss". The Court agreed and Ordered Restitution as requested by the government. My prison sentence has since expired in 2009, and I have continued to pay this Restitution. My house was forfeited and my children's 529 College accounts seized.. Half of My wife's tax return is seized every year because we file as married even though I have no income. These issues were not raised on direct appear and my 2255 was denied. But I have researched both 9th Circuit and Supreme Court laws and I have realized that "Restitution Under MVRA must be for "ACTUAL LOSS" and not "INTENDED LOSS" as in my case. I need assistance in filing a brief to go back to Court to correct this error as it is illegal and violates my due process since I am still paying as of today. I believe there is a live controversy here and also that it is never too late to right a wrong here that not only violates the law but my due process rights