Evaluate PPT and Docs for quality and content

@ruchis272

Hi there, This kind of work genuinely interests me — evaluating AI-generated business content isn't just proofreading, it's applying real judgment on whether something would actually hold up in front of a client or a boardroom, and that's a skill I enjoy putting to use. Here's how I'd approach reviews like this: For every PPT or document, I'd first understand what the user actually asked for and what source material was provided, then check whether the output genuinely answers that request rather than just looking polished. I'd assess logic and completeness — are the important points covered, are there gaps a real business user would notice, does the reasoning actually hold together across finance, legal, healthcare, or whichever domain it's in. When comparing multiple outputs, I'd identify which one is strongest not just on surface polish but on accuracy, relevance, and how well it tells a coherent story, then rate against your set criteria with brief, plain-spoken comments explaining exactly why one output beat another. I'd also flag formatting and structural issues — inconsistent slide layouts, weak visual hierarchy, awkward flow — since presentation quality is part of whether the content actually lands with its intended audience Looking forward to getting started.

@iffatkhatib

Hi, this looks like a strong fit for me. I have an MS in Computer Engineering with a focus on AI/ML and 3+ years across fintech, healthcare, and business analytics, so I'm used to switching between domains and quickly figuring out what actually matters in a document or a deck. More directly relevant: as a graduate research assistant, I built and ran an evaluation framework for LLM outputs, testing 50+ prompt variants for reasoning, consistency, and hallucination, and writing up what worked and what didn't. I've also graded 100+ student projects as a teaching assistant, so I'm used to applying a rubric consistently and explaining my ratings in plain language instead of just checking boxes. That combination is basically what this role needs: judging whether an output makes sense and holds together, not just proofreading it. I'm comfortable in Excel and PowerPoint and have built dashboards and reports in Power BI, Tableau, and Excel across microfinance, food delivery, and enterprise clients, so formatting, structure, and "does this look professional" are things I can catch quickly too. Happy to start with a sample review so you can see how I think through it before committing to ongoing work.