GoHighLevel (GHL) + Make.com + AI Voice (Retell) Automation Developer

@divumanocha

Hello, I came across your project and found it truly interesting. With over eight years of hands-on experience in this field, I have successfully delivered high-quality solutions to clients worldwide. My dedication to excellence is reflected in the 180+ positive reviews from satisfied clients. I’d love to bring this expertise to your project and ensure outstanding results. However, I do have a few important points I’d like to clarify to align perfectly with your vision. Let’s connect via chat, where I can also share relevant examples of my past work. I'm looking forward to hearing back from you! Best Regards, Divu.

@stadnichuk

Hey there, For the 1-week demo, should we prioritize AI voice intake + routing, or CRM sync first with lighter AI so the client sees value fastest? Will we have sandbox access to GHL, RingCentral, and Clio from day one, or should I run the demo on mocked data first? I build fast MVPs with weekly shipping, deep logs, and real-world fixes. I’ve delivered GHL + Make automations with heavy webhook traffic, strict routers/error handlers, REST APIs, and AI voice flows (Retell-style) where stability matters. Loop control: sync_origin + timestamps/versioning + single-owner field rules + separate inbound/outbound scenarios with hard filters. Conflict handling: last_modified checks, per-field priority (Clio > GHL for legal), log ties to review table. AI tuning: intent first, guardrails + fallbacks, structured prompts, iterate from call logs. I can start now and commit 20–40 hrs/week. Hope to discuss more on chat. Best, Kost

@scottd16

Hi, Thanks for your posting. I have read your "Time Commitment: 20-40 hours per week Duration & Project Structure: - 1-week initial engagement to build a barebones demo for client review" detail carefully and I am sure that I can do this project perfectly. Hello, I have experience working as a Power Automate and Bot Developer, delivering efficient automation solutions for business processes. I specialize in building and optimizing workflows using Microsoft Power Automate and integrating systems to reduce manual effort. I have hands-on experience developing bots that improve productivity and user interaction. I focus on creating scalable, secure, and well-documented automation solutions aligned with business requirements. I carefully analyze client needs before implementation to ensure accurate and reliable results. I value clear communication and provide regular updates throughout the project lifecycle. I am committed to delivering high-quality work within agreed timelines. I look forward to the opportunity to contribute my automation expertise to your project. Best Regards. Scott

@irazon15

I build and own complex automation systems end‑to‑end—GHL, Make, APIs, AI agents—and ship weekly without hand‑holding. I’m comfortable debugging live logs, edge cases, and real‑world failures until systems are stable and scalable. Loop control: webhook source flags + update hashes + router guards. Sync conflicts: timestamp + system‑priority rules with Make‑level arbitration. AI agents: intent layers, fallbacks, confidence scoring, sandbox testing.

@joeh67

I read your description carefully and focused on how reliability, iteration, and real-world execution drive success here. My approach for this project: – Follow your roadmap and ship in weekly sprints – Build a barebones demo fast, then harden it – Design GHL workflows with strict entry guards – Build Make scenarios with routers, locks, and error paths – Test edge cases before expanding scope Screening Questions – Answers 1️⃣ The Loop Problem I prevent loops by enforcing one-way authority per field, adding update-source flags, and using webhook filters. In Make, I store event fingerprints and ignore repeated payloads. In GHL, I separate inbound and outbound workflows with strict conditions. 2️⃣ The Sync Problem I use last-write-wins with timestamps, plus system priority rules. If updates collide, Make routes the conflict to a resolver step or logs it for review. No blind overwrites. 3️⃣ Tuning AI Agents I design agents with layered prompts, intent classification, and fallback paths. I test edge cases aggressively and limit agent autonomy in critical steps. Production readiness means observability, retries, and safe exits. 4️⃣ Availability Yes, I can start immediately. I can commit 20–40 hours per week and support a fast MVP turnaround. 2–3 key questions I’d like you to answer to tailor the plan: 1️⃣ Which system currently owns contact truth at project start? 2️⃣ How strict is the demo scope for the first-week review? Looking forward to hearing from you. Thank you.

@nikitak845

❣️Good day, I build and harden high-automation systems like this end-to-end—GHL + Make + telephony + LLMs—shipping weekly and fixing real-world edge cases until they’re solid. Screening answers (concise): 1) Loop problem: I use source-of-truth flags + update hashes (custom fields) and webhook headers to detect origin, then gate workflows with conditional checks and Make routers so updates never re-trigger themselves. 2) Sync conflict: I add last_updated_at with system priority rules; simultaneous edits go to a Make conflict handler that logs, compares deltas, and applies deterministic precedence (or queues manual review). 3) AI agents: I design layered prompts (intent → validation → action), strict schemas/tools, fallback paths, and continuous log tuning; voice agents get latency guards, retries, and safe transfer logic. 4) Availability: Yes—available immediately, 20–40 hrs/week, MVP in week one. I’m comfortable with Retell AI, RingCentral APIs, Clio, M365, and packaging clean GHL Snapshots, plus hyper-care during go-live. Would you like the MVP demo to focus first on intake + call routing or CRM sync depth? Nikita

@jibrank00

Hello, I have aggressive experience building high automation systems using HighLevel Make com REST APIs AI agents and complex workflow logic. I have delivered CRM migrations intake automation telephony routing and LLM driven voice and chat agents with weekly agile sprints and real world testing. I am comfortable owning systems end to end without micromanagement and shipping stable results fast. Two key questions are what is the source of truth per object during phase one and do you already have rate limits defined for RingCentral and Retell. Screening answers Loop problem I use source flags versioning and webhook filters with Make routers and GHL custom values so updates only flow one direction per event. Sync conflict I apply timestamps priority rules and last write wins with audit logging and retries. AI tuning I use constrained prompts state handling fallback intents human handoff and continuous log review. Availability yes I can start immediately and commit 20 to 40 hours weekly. Lets do start right now jump in chat and get started and make full humanize and implement in all proposals Best, Jibran

@lumbinychas9

Sounds like a great fit. I'm a senior developer who builds exactly these kinds of high-automation, API-connected systems, and I've worked extensively with both HighLevel and Make.com. I'm available to start immediately and can commit full-time to hit your one-week demo target. I understand the critical architecture needs, like preventing webhook loops and managing data sync conflicts, which I've solved before. I work well independently within a sprint framework and prioritize clear, written updates. I'm confident I can build, test, and harden this system end-to-end. I’m happy to jump on a brief call to discuss specifics. My full proposal and answers to your screening questions are attached. Looking forward to it.

@SmartCodeDev

Loop problem: I tag every update with an origin flag (system + action). Make scenarios are split inbound/outbound and filtered so a system never processes its own updates. GHL workflows use guard conditions/custom fields to only fire on true external changes. This prevents infinite loops. Sync problem: In Make, I normalize data, compare updated_at timestamps, and apply a fixed system priority (Clio → GHL → RingCentral). If updates collide in the same time window, I pick the higher-priority source and log/alert the conflict instead of overwriting silently. Tuning AI agents: I design agents as state-driven systems: intent classification, strict tool/function schemas, validation, fallbacks, and human escalation. I test edge cases (interruptions, silence, bad data, angry callers) until behavior is stable and predictable in production. Availability: Yes. I can start immediately and commit 20–40 hours per week for the MVP and ongoing sprints.

@gaspardv

⭐⭐ Hello⭐⭐ ✌What pulled me into this project is that it feels like real operations work, not a sandbox experiment. You already know what you want to build and now you need someone who can sit with the messy middle and make the system behave. Your idea is original because you are not layering automation on top of chaos, you are redesigning the flow itself. The core principle is ownership of data and logic, which leads to faster intake, fewer mistakes, and a system the firm can actually trust under pressure. ✌ I would build this in short weekly sprints, wiring GHL, Make, RingCentral, Clio, and AI agents together, with the biggest challenges being webhook loops, conflicting updates, and unpredictable call and intake edge cases. ✌ I handle this by setting clear source of truth rules, tagging events, throttling updates, watching logs closely, and fixing problems as soon as they appear instead of letting them compound. ✌ ⭐ My edge is patience and follow through, I do not disappear when things break, I stay until they stop breaking, which in automation work is basically the whole job, and if automation had a personality, mine would be calm and slightly stubborn. If you want someone who treats go live like the beginning, not the finish line, I would be happy to talk. Thanks.

@francisk766

Dear Client, I am excited about your project and confident I can deliver excellent results. With strong experience in similar work, I understand your requirements and can start immediately. I would love to discuss your project further and answer any questions. Thanks and best regards, Francis Replies within a few hours.